Explanation: if no animals were found so there will be everything getting imbalanced. so if no animals are present there will be no life on earth for other species also.

Photosynthesis is a useless ability without some way of exposing yourself to as much of the Sun’s energy as possible. That requires a large surface area, relative to their volume. “Animals need a lot of energy, and moving at all doesn’t really jive well with photosynthesis,” says Agapakis.

In a Nutshell : We can’t photosynthesise because we don’t have chloroplasts, and we wouldn’t get enough food out of it to make it worthwhile anyway.

As animals are not autotrophs as they do not have the ability to perform photosynthesis because they lack chloroplasts, it cannot be possible for a single-celled animal to have have chloroplasts.

Plants cells use photosynthesis from the sun, which requires them to have chloroplast filled with chlorophyll to complete this function; animal cells do not have chloroplasts. Chlorophyll also helps make plants green.

Life could not exist on Earth without trees because they produce most of the oxygen that humans and wildlife breathe. Trees absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and release oxygen using the process of photosynthesis. Additionally, trees provide a supply of lumber, seeds, and fruit.

If all the herbivores are removed from the food web then the carnivores will no get food to eat as a result they will also die and soon all the animals on the planet will die and the life will be finished.

They won’t die or anything, but it’s inefficient and will just lead to malnourishment. Animals like the panda pretty much crap on all evolutionary logic and choose to eat bamboo despite their reasonable foregut. As you may know, they need heaps of it because they suck at digesting plants.

If the herbivores are removed from the ecosystem, there will be no food for carnivores which are dependent on herbivores for their survival. As a result, the population of carnivores will also start dwindling. This will lead to ecological instability.

Answer. Answer: When any organism is removed from a food chain, the rest of the food chain is disrupted. When those animals die out due to lack of food, the secondary consumers who feed on the primary consumers will have no food source, and so on.

If there were no carnivores, the herbivore populations would explode and they will rapidly consume large amounts of plants and fungi, growing until there is not enough food to sustain them. Eventually, the herbivores would starve, leaving only those plants that were distasteful or poisonous to them.

If the herbivores and carnivores were removed, there would be changes to the biodiversity of the producers, but they would still survive. The food chain would be limited to these producers and decomposers, which break down dead organisms. The food chain would be intact, but would be mainly made of producers.

You cannot have a food chain until food has been produced. Plants are called producers because they use energy from the sun to make their own food through a process called photosynthesis.