What did the Court rule about Dred Scott? They ruled that African Americans, whether they were slaves or had ancestors who were slaves, had no legal view in court. They felt that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional. In the eyes of the court, Dred Scott had no legal right to request his freedom.

For all practical purposes, Northern courts and politicians rejected Scott v. Sandford as binding. Dred Scott did, in fact, get his freedom, but not through the courts. After he and his wife were later bought by the Blow family (who had sold Scott to Emerson in the first place), they were freed in 1857.

• African Americans (whether slave or free) were NOT US citizens and had no rights.
• Slaves were property and Congress could not deny people the right to “property” ANYWHERE.
• Slavery could not be banned anywhere!

Scott sued Mrs. Emerson for “false imprisonment” and battery. Scott argued that he was being held illegally because he had become a free man as soon as he had lived in a free state. He claimed he was taken to a slave state against his will.

For the most part, federal court jurisdictions only hear cases in which the United States is a party, cases involving violations of the Constitution or federal law, crimes on federal land, and bankruptcy cases. Federal courts also hear cases based on state law that involve parties from different states.

Federal courts generally have exclusive jurisdiction in cases involving (1) the Constitution, (2) violations of federal laws, (3) controversies between states, (4) disputes between parties from different states, (5) suits by or against the federal government, (6) foreign governments and treaties, (7) admiralty and …

Federal courts also have “exclusive” subject matter jurisdiction over copyright cases, admiralty cases, lawsuits involving the military, immigration laws, and bankruptcy proceedings.

Federal courts may hear cases concerning state laws if the issue is whether the state law violates the federal Constitution. A person can go to federal or state court to bring a case under the federal law or both the federal and state laws. A state-law-only case can be brought only in state court.

There are three types of jurisdictions:

• Original Jurisdiction– the court that gets to hear the case first.
• Appellate Jurisdiction– the power for a higher court to review a lower courts decision.
• Exclusive Jurisdiction– only that court can hear a specific case.

There are four main types of jurisdiction (arranged from greatest Air Force authority to least): (1) exclusive federal jurisdiction; (2) concurrent federal jurisdic- tion; (3) partial federal jurisdiction; and (4) proprietary jurisdiction. Depending on your installation, more than one type of jurisdiction may apply.

Terms in this set (4)

• Exclusive jurisdiction. Only federal courts have authority to hear , state courts cannot.
• Concurrent Jurisdiction. Federal or state courts could hear.
• Original Jurisdiction. Court is the first one to hear case.
• Appelate Jurisdiction. Court can only hear a case on appeal.

Jurisdiction in the courts of a particular state may be determined by the location of real property in a state (in rem jurisdiction), or whether the parties are located within the state (in personam jurisdiction). Thus, any state court may have jurisdiction over a matter, but the “venue” is in a particular county.

Jurisdiction over the person (also sometimes simply referred to as personal jurisdiction) is jurisdiction over the persons or entities, such as corporations or partnerships, involved in the lawsuit. In rem jurisdiction is implicated when an object or piece of land is the subject of the legal action.

Basically, an unlimited civil case is any case that is not a limited civil case under the definition of California Code of Civil Procedure, Sections 85-86.1. …

the authority given by law to a court to try cases and rule on legal matters within a particular geographic area and/or over certain types of legal cases. It is vital to determine before a lawsuit is filed which court has jurisdiction.

Terms in this set (5)

• jurisdiction. the official power to make legal decisions and judgments.
• exclusive jurisdiction. exists where one court has the power to adjudicate a case to the exclusion of all other courts.
• concurrent jurisdiction.
• original jurisdiction.
• appellate jurisdiction.

The court must have power over the defendant that you are suing, which is known as personal jurisdiction, and it must have the power to resolve the legal issues in the case, which is known as subject matter jurisdiction.

‘An examination of the cases in the books discloses numerous attempts to define the term ‘jurisdiction’, which has been stated to be ‘the power to hear and determine issues of law and fact;’ ‘the authority by which three judicial officers take cognizance of and decide cause;’ ‘the authority to hear and decide a legal …

Examples of judicial jurisdiction are: appellate jurisdiction, in which a superior court has power to correct legal errors made in a lower court; concurrent jurisdiction, in which a suit might be brought to any of two or more courts; and federal jurisdiction (as opposed, for example, to state jurisdiction).

WHAT ARE THE ELEMENTS OF JURISDICTION OVER SUBJECT MATTER?

• Nature of the offense.
• Authority of the court to impose the penalty imposable given the allegation in the information.
• Territorial jurisdiction of the court imposing the penalty.

Jurisdiction Meaning The Supreme Court in India has three types of jurisdictions – original, appellate and advisory as provided in Articles 131, 133 – 136 and 143 respectively of the Indian Constitution.

The original jurisdiction is set forth in the United States Code. The Supreme Court has original and exclusive jurisdiction to hear disputes between different states — meaning that no other federal court can hear such a dispute. An example of such a case is the 1998 case of State of New Jersey v. State of New York.

Nearly all criminal cases start off in the Local Court before a magistrate. Under NSW law, many of the more serious matters have to be transferred (committed) to the District Court and the most severe cases (such as murder) to the Supreme Court.

If a person is actually killed, the penalty is life in prison or the death penalty and up to a $250,000 fine; If a person suffers personal injury, the penalty ranges from zero to 20 years in prison and/or a fine; If there is no death or serious injury, the penalty ranges from zero to 10 years in prison and/or a fine.