# Start Searching the Answers

The Internet has many places to ask questions about anything imaginable and find past answers on almost everything.

The Question & Answer (Q&A) Knowledge Managenet

The Internet has many places to ask questions about anything imaginable and find past answers on almost everything.

Table of Contents

- Is an irrational number times an irrational number irrational?
- When you multiply two irrational numbers together you always get an irrational number?
- Is 3.0 A irrational number?
- Is 2.11 a rational number?
- Is 0.181818 a rational number?
- Is 1.0227 a rational number?
- Is 3.275 a rational number?
- Is 13.75 a rational number?
- Is 4.567 a rational number?
- Is 4.472 a rational number?
- Is 7.78 a rational number?
- Is 4.567 a irrational number?
- Is 7548123 an irrational number?
- Is 0.76 a rational number?
- Why is 8.7 a rational number?
- Is 65% rational or irrational?

If you multiply any irrational number by the rational number zero, the result will be zero, which is rational. Any other situation, however, of a rational times an irrational will be irrational. A better statement would be: “The product of a non-zero rational number and an irrational number is irrational.”

“The product of two irrational numbers is SOMETIMES irrational.” The product of two irrational numbers, in some cases, will be irrational. However, it is possible that some irrational numbers may multiply to form a rational product.

Explanation: The definition of an irrational number is that it is a number that can’t be written as a fraction of two integers. All of which are fractions of two integers. This means that โ3 can be expressed as a fraction of two integers, and therefore it is not irrational.

Hannah; 2.11 is a rational number because it’s a decimal. Hannah; 2.11 is a terminating decimal that can be written as 2 11/100. Rational numbers can be expressed as fractions.

18 can be written as a ratio of two integers having 2 as the numerator and 11 as the denominator. So, it is a rational number (named after ratio).

The decimal 1.0227 is a rational number. First of all, it is a terminating decimal, which means that the decimal has a definite ending point.

Answer. Answer: Yes, as it is a terminating decimal number.

We learned that rational numbers are integers, whole numbers, and natural numbers. Irrational numbers are numbers that can’t be written as a fraction. We added numbers like 24.47+ (-13.75) or -13.53+ 50.

Since q may beequal to 1, every integer is a rational number . Think of 4.567 in this way: It’s equivalent to 4567 / 10000, which is the ratio of integers. Thus, 4.567 is rational.

no it isnt a rational nu7mber.

Is 7.78 a rational number a) yes, it has a pattern which is repeating.

0.24758326… Numbers that are not rational are called irrational. An irrational number is a number that cannot be written in the form where a and bare integers and b 0. 4.567 as irrational because it does not repeat.

Answer. Answer: nope, it is not a rational number but an irrational number… rational number : numbers which are in the form of ratios, fractions, decimals, and are called rational numbers.

Remember that fractions (also known as rational numbers) can be written as terminating (ending) or repeating decimals; for example, 0.5 = 21 and 0.76 = 2519 , are terminating decimals, while 0.333333…. = 31 and 0.538461538461… = 137 are repeating decimals.

All integers are rational numbers. The number โ8 is a rational number because it can be rewritten as โ81 . The number 0 is a rational number because it can be rewritten as 01 . All mixed numbers are rational numbers.

65 is a rational number because it can be expressed as the quotient of two integers: 65 รท 1.