Start Searching the Answers
The Internet has many places to ask questions about anything imaginable and find past answers on almost everything.
The Question & Answer (Q&A) Knowledge Managenet
The Internet has many places to ask questions about anything imaginable and find past answers on almost everything.
Both men are also “skilful in the Italian vintages.” Montresor says that “In this respect [he does] not differ from [Fortunato] materially.” On the other hand, while Fortunato seems a little ridiculous—even his Carnival costume, that of a jester, hints at his foolishness—Montresor is cunning and manipulative.
Montresor is far colder and more detached than the jovial Fortunato who, though drunk, appears in the carnival costume of a court jester. Fortunato is obviously much more trusting than Montresor; Fortunato willingly follows him into the cellars, never considering that his friend has ulterior motives.
First of all, there are basic features which the two characters Montresor and Fortunato have in common, namely, both of them live in Italy and have a good knowledge about wine, and therefore are passionate wine collectors and of course also wine drinkers, but of course no alcoholics.
How are Montresor and Fortunato alike? They both like expensive wine. Montresor carefully plans his revenge. He does all of the following to prepare EXCEPT ONE.
According to Montresor, Fortunato’s one weakness is the pride he takes in “his connoisseurship in wine.” It is this pride that Montresor plans to exploit in order to lure his nemesis, Fortunato, into his family catacombs so that he can wall the man in and guarantee his tortured and painful death.
After leading the intoxicated Fortunato deep into the catacombs of his palazzo, Montresor ends up shackling his enemy to an alcove and proceeds to build a wall around Fortunato. Montresor murders Fortunato by burying him alive.
The definition of revenge is the act of doing something to hurt someone because that person did something that hurt you. The main character in the story, Montresor, explains his jealousy of Fortunato. To get revenge, he leads the other man to a slow death and seems to feel he is justified in this.
Nothing can really justify out-and-out premeditated murder, and certainly this is true of Montressor’s actions in Edgar Allan Poe’s short story, “The Cask of Amontillado.” We are never specifically told what act Fortunato has inflicted upon Montressor to cause such a horrific response.
In the case of many justice systems, the one owed is society. In believing that justice is in fact the same as revenge, with nearly invisible difference in matters of action, then revenge can still be conditionally justified: If both the individual and the state have been avenged, it is justice.
In “The Cask of Amontillado,” revenge is not justified. The narrator, Montresor, tells his listener that Fortunato had he had borne…
Answer: I think we can’t justify putting justice in our own hands because no matter how people explain that putting justice in their hands are a way of revenge, or a way to make someone pay it’s still not right to justify that. So for me, nothing justify with putting justice in our own hands because it’s morally wrong.
Granted, Montresor was jealous of Fortunato, because Fortunato was still rich and respected. But, the last straw was Fortuanato’s insult, probably committed unknowingly, that prompted Montresor’s revenge.